PRATAMA, ARBI and Hasan, KN. Sofyan and Yuningsih, Henny (2023) ANALISIS ALAT BUKTI PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA YANG DILAKUKAN BERSAMA-SAMA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 1358/PID.B/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst dan Nomor 490/Pid.B/2017/PN.Jkt.Tim). Undergraduate thesis, Sriwijaya University.
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (15MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_01_front_ref.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (847kB) |
|
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_02.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (492kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_03.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (646kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_04.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (187kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_05_ref.pdf - Bibliography Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (13kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_06_lamp.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (597kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
This thesis is entitled "Analysis of Evidence in the Judge's Decision on the Case of Premeditated Murder that was Done Together (Study of District Court Decisions Number 1358 /PID.B /2014 /PN.JKT.PST and Number 490 /Pid.B /2017 /PN.Jkt.Tim)". The focus of the problem in this study is how the position of the Visum et Repertum evidence in the trial supports the role of the accused in committing premeditated murder which was carried out together, whether the application of criminal sanctions to the District Court decision No. 1358/PID.B/2014/PN.Jkt. Pst and Number 490/Pid.B/2017/PN.Jkt.Tim are in accordance with the legal facts at trial, as well as how to renew the provisions regarding evidence in criminal procedural law in the future. This research method is normative juridical. The results of the study saw that the Visum et Repertum evidence became the main support in the legal facts at trial proving that the defendant fulfilled all the elements in the primary indictment. According to the author, the urgency of the means of evidence regulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code will be fulfilled in the article on evidence in the draft Law on Criminal Procedure, considering that changes or developments in society, science and technology can also result in the development of criminal acts. Reflecting on the two decisions above, evidence such as electronic evidence and the judge's observation can be key in proving the facts at trial, considering that the two pieces of evidence have been discussed in the decision but are only limited to non-juridical aspects.
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Pembunuhan Berencana secara bersama-sama, Alat Bukti |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) > K5015.4-5350 Criminal law K Law > K Law (General) > K5401-5570 Criminal procedure |
Divisions: | 02-Faculty of Law > 74101-Law (S2) |
Depositing User: | Arbi Pratama |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jun 2023 04:10 |
Last Modified: | 20 Jun 2023 05:04 |
URI: | http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/107054 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |