ANALISIS ALAT BUKTI PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA YANG DILAKUKAN BERSAMA-SAMA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 1358/PID.B/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst dan Nomor 490/Pid.B/2017/PN.Jkt.Tim)

PRATAMA, ARBI and Hasan, KN. Sofyan and Yuningsih, Henny (2023) ANALISIS ALAT BUKTI PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA YANG DILAKUKAN BERSAMA-SAMA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 1358/PID.B/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst dan Nomor 490/Pid.B/2017/PN.Jkt.Tim). Undergraduate thesis, Sriwijaya University.

[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050_TURNITIN.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (15MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_01_front_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_01_front_ref.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (847kB)
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_02.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_02.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (492kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_03.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_03.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (646kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_04.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_04.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (187kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_05_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_05_ref.pdf - Bibliography
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (13kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_06_lamp.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681923050_0015015802_0024018303_06_lamp.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (597kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This thesis is entitled "Analysis of Evidence in the Judge's Decision on the Case of Premeditated Murder that was Done Together (Study of District Court Decisions Number 1358 /PID.B /2014 /PN.JKT.PST and Number 490 /Pid.B /2017 /PN.Jkt.Tim)". The focus of the problem in this study is how the position of the Visum et Repertum evidence in the trial supports the role of the accused in committing premeditated murder which was carried out together, whether the application of criminal sanctions to the District Court decision No. 1358/PID.B/2014/PN.Jkt. Pst and Number 490/Pid.B/2017/PN.Jkt.Tim are in accordance with the legal facts at trial, as well as how to renew the provisions regarding evidence in criminal procedural law in the future. This research method is normative juridical. The results of the study saw that the Visum et Repertum evidence became the main support in the legal facts at trial proving that the defendant fulfilled all the elements in the primary indictment. According to the author, the urgency of the means of evidence regulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code will be fulfilled in the article on evidence in the draft Law on Criminal Procedure, considering that changes or developments in society, science and technology can also result in the development of criminal acts. Reflecting on the two decisions above, evidence such as electronic evidence and the judge's observation can be key in proving the facts at trial, considering that the two pieces of evidence have been discussed in the decision but are only limited to non-juridical aspects.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Pembunuhan Berencana secara bersama-sama, Alat Bukti
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General) > K5015.4-5350 Criminal law
K Law > K Law (General) > K5401-5570 Criminal procedure
Divisions: 02-Faculty of Law > 74101-Law (S2)
Depositing User: Arbi Pratama
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2023 04:10
Last Modified: 20 Jun 2023 05:04
URI: http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/107054

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item