KLASIFIKASI TINGKAT RISIKO KREDIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE NAIVE BAYES DAN FUZZY NAIVE BAYES DENGAN TEKNIK K-FOLD CROSS VALIDATION

LELIANI, LELIANI and Dewi, Novi Rustiana and Zayanti, Des Alwine (2023) KLASIFIKASI TINGKAT RISIKO KREDIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE NAIVE BAYES DAN FUZZY NAIVE BAYES DENGAN TEKNIK K-FOLD CROSS VALIDATION. Undergraduate thesis, Sriwijaya University.

[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (3MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_TURNITIN.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (6MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_01_front_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_01_front_ref.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_02.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_02.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (530kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_03.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_03.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (358kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_04.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_04.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (531kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_05.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_05.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (203kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_06_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_06_ref.pdf - Bibliography
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (328kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_07_lamp.pdf] Text
RAMA_44201_08011181924118_0013117004_0004127001_07_lamp.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (370kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Credit is a condition of delivery in the form of goods, money or services from the first party (credit giver) to another party (credit recipient) with a joint agreement to be completed within a certain period of time in return for the additional principal. Customers who apply for credit must meet the conditions set by the bank with the aim of avoiding unexpected possibilities such as bad credit. In preventing bad credit, it is necessary to make the right decision to accept or reject credit applications. Therefore, this research was conducted with the aim of classifying credit risk levels using the naïve Bayes and fuzzy naïve Bayes methods. However, in the use of naïve Bayes and fuzzy naïve Bayes methods, there are often ups and downs in accuracy, so validation techniques are needed to measure model performance. In this study, the k-fold cross validation technique will be used to obtain the model with the best accuracy. The data used is the UCI Credit Card Approval Dataset Repository, totaling 30,000 data. Classification using the naïve Bayes method produces an average value of accuracy, precision, recall and f-score of 79.85%, 70.34%, 15.41%, 5.24%, respectively. Classification using the fuzzy naïve Bayes method produces an average value of accuracy, precision, recall and f-score of 80.23%, 62.22%, 26.72%, 37.32%, respectively. The results showed that the fuzzy naïve Bayes method has a better level of classification accuracy than the naïve Bayes method as seen from the average accuracy, recall and f-score. However, the naïve Bayes method has better precision than the naïve Bayes fuzzy method.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Pengetahuan Guru, Pemodelan Matematika
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General) > Q1-295 General
Divisions: 08-Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science > 44201-Mathematics (S1)
Depositing User: Leliani Leliani
Date Deposited: 09 Jun 2023 07:26
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2023 07:26
URI: http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/107515

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item