Higher order thinking skills which include analyzing, evaluating, and creating skills are needed to solving problems and making decisions so that is important for every student to prepare them for the future. This study aims to describe high school students’ higher order thinking skills on circle materials through problem-based learning. The subjects are 33 students of class XI MIPA 1 Senior High School Number 1 Tanjung Batu. The data were collected through tests and interviews and analyzed by qualitative descriptive. The results of this study show that analyzing indicators dominates higher order thinking skills that appear in the class as many as 29 students. While evaluating and creating indicators are belong to low, where the evaluating indicators only appear in 1 student and creating indicators also appear in 1 student.

Topics
Students, Educational institutions, Learning and learning models, Interviews
1.
L. W.
Anderson
 and
D. R.
Krathwohl
,
Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
(
Addison Wesley Logman Inc
.,
New York
,
2001
).
Google Scholar
 
2.
S. M.
Brookhart
,
How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom-Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development
(
ASCD
,
Alexandria
,
2010
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
S.
Saifer
,
Hot Skills: Developing Higher-Order Thinking in Young Learners
(
Redleaf Press
,
St. Paul
,
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
OECD
,
PISA 2015 Results (Volume I) : Excellence and Equity in Education
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2016
).
5.
OECD
,
PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2019
).
6.
OECD
,
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) : Result From PISA 2015, Country Note Indonesia
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2016
).
7.
N.
Agustyaningrum
,
Pythagoras Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
,
4
,
39
–
46
(
2015
)
Google Scholar
 
8.
Kemdikbud
,
Panduan Penulisan Soal SMP/MTs Tahun 2017
(
Balitbang Kemdikbud
,
Jakarta
,
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
9.
D.
Nurhadiyanto
 and
Wagiran
,
Seminar Nasional Telisik Hambatan Pelaksanaan SMK dan Solusinya
, (
Jurusan Pendidikan Teknik Mesin UNESS
,
Semarang
,
2007
).
Google Scholar
 
10.
N. S.
Tama
,
N.
Aisyah
,
B.
Santoso
, and
E.
Kurniadi
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
,
1480
,
012008
,
2020
.
Google Scholar
 
11.
I. A.
Kurnia
,
Jalinus
, and
S. N.
Siregar
,
JOMFKIP: Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
,
4
,
1
–
10
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
A. U.
Hidayati
 and
H.
Retnawati
,
Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science
, (
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
,
Yogyakarta
,
2016
), pp.
55
–
50
.
13.
Y. D.
Haryanti
,
Jurnal Cakrawala
,
5
,
57
–
63
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
14.
S.
Bakhri
 and
Supriadi
,
Seminar Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY
, (
Seminar Nasional UNY
,
Yogyakarta
,
2017
), pp.
717
–
722
Google Scholar
 
15.
O.
Ateş
 and
A.
Eryilmaz
,
Buca Eğıtım Fakültesı Dergısı
,
28
,
40
–
58
(
2010
).
Google Scholar
 
16.
A.D.
Rahmawati
,
Riyadi
 and
S.
Subanti
,
JMEE
,
4
,
64
–
75
(
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
17.
J.
Jailani
,
S.
Sugiman
, and
E.
Apino
,
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
,
4
,
247
–
259
(
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.17674
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
©2023 Authors. Published by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.