This study aims to produce a learning trajectory that can assist students in understanding the material of linear equation system two variables using the Model Eliciting Activities (MEAs) approach. The research method used is design research with three stages, namely preliminary design, design experiments, and retrospective analysis. In the preliminary design stage, the researcher reviewed the literature and designed a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) which contained the learning flow of the two-variable linear equation system with the MEAs approach. At the design experiment stage, the HLT that has been designed is tested on students to find out the strategies and thoughts of students in studying a linear equation system two variables through activities. The results of the trial were analyzed at the retrospective analysis stage to produce a Learning Trajectory (LT). The subjects in this study were students of eight grade Xaverius 7 Junior High School in Palembang as many as 20 students. Data collection techniques used interviews, pre- test, post-test, documentation, and field notes. The results of this study indicate that a series of learning activities can help students understand the concept of linear equation system two variable and can solve problems related to the material.

1.
R.
Kirvan
,
C. R.
Rakes
, and
R.
Zamora
, “
Flipping an Algebra Classroom: Analyzing, Modeling, and Solving Systems of Linear Equations
,”
Comput. Sch.
,
32
, no.
3-4
, pp.
201
223
,
2015
.
2.
R. I. N. 35 Permendikbud
,
Tsanawiyah, Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 58 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah.
2018
.
3.
D. E.
Putri
, “
Preliminary research of development learning design of system of two linear equations based on realistic mathematics education Preliminary research of development learning design of system of two linear equations based on realistic mathematics education
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
2019
.
4.
A.
Yusuf
and
N.
Fitriani
, “
Analisis Kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel di SMPN 1 Campaka Mulya-Cianjur
,”
J. Pembelajaran Mat. Inov.
,
3
, no.
1
, pp.
59
68
,
2020
.
5.
M. T.
Bakar
,
D.
Suryadi
, and
D.
Darhim
, “
Learning obstacles on linear equations concept in junior high school students: Analysis of intellectual need of DNR-based instructions
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1157
, no.
3
,
2019
.
6.
W.
Widada
,
D.
Herawaty
,
M. H.
Rahman
,
D.
Yustika
,
E. P.
Gusvarini
, and
A. Falaq Dwi
Anggoro
, “
Overcoming the difficulty of understanding systems of linear equations through learning ethnomathematics
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1470
, no.
1
,
2020
.
7.
J. A.
Van De Walle
,
Matematika Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah Edisi Keenam
,
Keenam. Jakarta: Erlangga
,
2008
.
8.
S. A.
Chamberlin
and
S. M.
Moon
, “
How Does the Problem Based Learning Approach Compare to the Model- Eliciting Activity Approach in Mathematics?
,”
Int. J. Math. Teach. Learn.
,
9
, no.
3
,
2008
.
9.
S.
Handajani
,
H.
Pratiwi
, and
M.
Mardiyana
, “
The 21st century skills with model eliciting activities on linear program
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1008
, no.
1
,
2018
.
10.
E.
Hamilton
,
R.
Lesh
,
F.
Lester
, and
M.
Brilleslyper
, “
Model-Elicting Activities (MEAs) as a Bridge Between Engineering Education Research and Mathematics Education Research
,”
Adv. Eng. Educ.
,
1
,
2008
.
11.
S. M.
Chamberlin
, S.A. and Moon, “
Model-eliciting activites: An introduction to education gifted
,”
J. Second. Gift. Educ.
,
17
, no.
1
, pp.
37
47
,
2005
.
12.
A.
Bakker
, “
Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools
.”
Utrech: CD-B Press
,
Utrech
,
2004
.
13.
J.
Van den Akker
,
B.
Bannan
,
A. E.
Kelly
,
N.
Nieveen
, and
T.
Plomp
, “Educational Design Research: An Introduction,” in
In Educational Design Research
,
T.
Plomp
and
N.
Nieveen
, Eds.
the Netherlands
:
SLO Netherland institude for curriculum development
,
2013
, pp.
10
51
.
14.
K.
Gravemeijer
and
P.
Cobb
, “
Design research from a learning design perspective
,” in
Educational Design Research
,
J.
Van den Akker
,
K.
Gravemeijer
,
S.
McKenney
, and
N.
Nieveen
, Eds.
New york
:
Routledge
,
2006
, pp.
17
51
.
15.
J. L.
Booth
,
C.
Barbieri
,
F.
Eyer
, and
E. J.
Pare-Blagoev
, “
Persistent and pernicious errors in algebraic problem solving
,”
J. Probl. Solving
,
7
, no.
1
,
2014
.
16.
D.
Malihatuddarojah
and
R. C. I.
Prahmana
, “
Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Operasi Bentuk Aljabar
,”
J. Pendidik. Mat.
,
13
, no.
1
, pp.
1
8
,
2019
.
17.
H.
Hanifah
, “
Penerapan pembelajaran model eliciting activities (MEA) dengan pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematis Siswa
,”
Kreano, J. Mat. Kreat.
,
6
, no.
2
, p.
191
,
2016
.
18.
N. P.
Munir
,
A.
Anas
, Sunarti,
N. R.
Mursalin
, and
I.
Natsir
, “
Development of Mathematics Student Worksheets Through the Approach Model Eliciting Activities (MEAs) on the Triangle Material
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1940
, no.
1
, p.
012097
,
2021
.
19.
S.
Delfia
,
I.
Irwan
, and
Y.
Yerizon
, “
Preliminary Research of Model Eliciting Activities learning Based to Improve Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1554
, no.
1
,
2020
.
20.
M.
Kartika
and
C.
Hiltrimartin
, “
Penerapan model eliciting activities (MEAs) dalam pembelajaran matematika materi relasi dan fungsi
,”
J. Gantang
,
4
, no.
2
, pp.
161
168
,
2019
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.