PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM MENUNTUT PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI GRATIFIKASIDI INDONESIA

RIANDA, HUSIN and Febrian, Febrian and Achmad, Ruben (2019) PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM MENUNTUT PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI GRATIFIKASIDI INDONESIA. Master thesis, Sriwijaya University.

	Text RAMA_74101_02012681721004.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (973kB) | Request a copy
	Text RAMA_74101_02012681721004_TURNITIN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text RAMA_74101_02012681721004_0031016203_0002095502_01_front_ref.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (1MB)
	Text RAMA_74101_02012681721004_0031016203_0002095502_02.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (536kB) | Request a copy
	Text RAMA_74101_02012681721004_0031016203_0002095502_03.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (536kB) | Request a copy
	Text RAMA_74101_02012681721004_0031016203_0002095502_04.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (192kB) | Request a copy
	Text RAMA_74101_02012681721004_0031016203_0002095502_05_ref.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. Download (327kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Gratuity corruption is a problem of the Indonesian people until now. The greater the number that is followed up by corruption in Indonesia can also prove weak law enforcement. Although there is Law Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Corruption Criminal Acts, the Attorney General has requested evidence to be in conflict with acts of corruption, corruption, gratuity. Thus, the focus of the discussion in this study discusses, the application and legal concepts for the Public Prosecutor in reversing the burden of proving the follow-up to gratuity corruption in Indonesia. While the method used in this study uses normative research methods. The results of this study are: explaining the regulation of the reversal of the burden of proof carried out by the Public Prosecutor in normatively demanding gratuity corruption in Indonesia as regulated in Article 12 B paragraph (1), Article 37, 37A and Article 38B of Law Number 31 The year 1999 was revised with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. However, in applying the reversal of the burden of proof carried out by the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting acts of corruption gratification in Indonesia, there are juridical and non-juridical challenges. Whereas the legal concept of reversing the burden of proof carried out by the Public Prosecutor in efforts to enforce the law of corruption gratuity in Indonesia must be supported by including the Corruption Eradication Commission in the legal entity related to the assistance of members of the theory of reversing the burden of proof.

Item Type:	Thesis (Master)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Burden of Proof Burden, Gratuity Corruption Criminal Act, Public Prosecutor.
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General) > K100-103 Legal education
Depositing User:	Users 893 not found.
Date Deposited:	07 Aug 2019 07:44
Last Modified:	07 Aug 2019 07:44
URI:	http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/2593

Actions (login required)

View Item