KEBIJAKAN PENERAPAN PIDANA MINIMAL KHUSUS OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM PADA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA

Sriwijaya University (2019) KEBIJAKAN PENERAPAN PIDANA MINIMAL KHUSUS OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM PADA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA. KODEPRODI74101#Law.

[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (3MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036_TURNITIN.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (36MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_01_front_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_01_front_ref.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_02.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_02.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (440kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_03.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_03.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (754kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_04.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_04.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (93kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_05_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_05_ref.pdf - Bibliography
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (178kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_06_lamp.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721036_0009126103_0002095502_06_lamp.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (716kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Judging from the aspects of the perpetrators, the modus operandi, and the consequences thereof, narcotics is an extraordinary crime, therefore it must be eradicated. Normatively, one of the instruments used to provide deterrent effect to the perpetrators is a minimum specific crime. But the facts in the field based on the SEMA and the Contra Legem authority of some judges are deviated from the provisions by imposing under the latest specific minimum crime and escaping from public attention in FiedelisArieSudewartoAlisNdukAnak FX Surajiwo's case and Egi Sandra Pranata bin Ariadi. Prosecuting Attorney in the requisitor demands under a specific minimum criminal. From the description, there are 3 (three) problems to be discussed, namely; 1. Whether prosecution by Prosecuting Attorney under a minimum specific crime contradicts the philosophical, sociological, juridical basis, in Law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. 2.) What is the basis for consideration of the Prosecuting Attorney demanding criminal under specific in terms of Criminal Law and Law number 16 of 2004 concerning juiciary and 3.)How is the concept of regulating minimum criminal sanctions specifically in Narcotics cases should be formulated in the Narcotics Law in the future (IusConstituendum). The research method used is a kind of qualitative research and the approach used is normative juridical and empirical juridical. From the results of the Requisitor research by the Prosecuting Attorneys under a minimum specific crime in the Fidelis ArieSudewanto case Nduk FX son of Ali Suryyo and Egi Sandra Pranata bin Ariadi cases, it did not contradict the philosophical, sociological and juridical basis of formation of Law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, because philosophically, sociologically, and juridically there are exceptions in certain circumstances and the intrinsic purpose of narcotics is for the benefit of medicine. As for the basis of the consideration of the Prosecuting Attorney demanding specific under-criminal Crime is the fact revealed at the trial described in criminal charges by paying attention to the value of justice that lives and develops in the community while the concept of regulating criminal sanctions is minimal specific crime in the future (IusConstituendum) will include: Criminal liability can be imposed on perpetrators of narcotics crimes who have the ultimate intention and purpose to damage themselves and others. While those who intend to start and end up using marijuana for treatment like Fidelis ArieSudewarto should not be criminalized. And it does not rule out the possibility after going through the results of comprehensiProsecutingve research on the efficacy of marijuana for health, marijuana can be legalized and excluded from Narcotics Group I with clear restrictions and usage rules as in other countries.

Item Type: Patent
Uncontrolled Keywords: Narcotics, Prosecuting Attorney, Specific Minimum Crime.
Subjects: K Law > KZ Law of Nations > KZ1168-1208 War crime trials
Divisions: 02-Faculty of Law > 74101-Law (S2)
Depositing User: Users 328 not found.
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2019 02:50
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2019 02:50
URI: http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/1407

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item