PERBANDINGAN KOEFISIEN ANALISA HARGA SATUAN UNTUK PEKERJAAN PERBAIKAN LERENG DENGAN METODE SNI DAN BOW

RIDHO, FAJAR MUHAMMAD and Juliantina, Ika and Adhitya, Bimo Brata (2019) PERBANDINGAN KOEFISIEN ANALISA HARGA SATUAN UNTUK PEKERJAAN PERBAIKAN LERENG DENGAN METODE SNI DAN BOW. Undergraduate thesis, Sriwijaya University.

[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (33MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_TURNITIN.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (46MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_01_front_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_01_front_ref.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (4MB)
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_02.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_02.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_03.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_03.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (570kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_04.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_04.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_05.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_05.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (510kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_06_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_06_ref.pdf - Bibliography
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (451kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_07_lamp.pdf] Text
RAMA_22201_03011281520117_0001076005_0010038104_07_lamp.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (25MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Planning a construction needs cost analysis to estimate how much the costs would spent and calculate the most efficient cost for a construction. In slope stabilization, soil nailing method is a new way to stabilize the slope. Analytical budget planning are needed to plan an efficient soil nailing construction. In Indonesia, there are two method to calculate construction cost budget there are SNI and BOW method. Nowadays in Indonesia there several users who still using BOW method to calculate the budget plan. Some even combine SNI and BOW method to gain the most efficient budget plan for them. This study aims to obtain the most efficient method of use in soil nailing work. This research compare those methods in applications of soil nailing construction with nine variation of nails. In 20o slope with variations gap 1 m, 1,25 m, 1,5 m and length of nail 8 m, 10 m, 12 m. Unit price analysis calculations shows that BOW method have a greater value on average than SNI method especially in labor section. In general works construction, SNI method is cheaper 3% than BOW method in budgeting costs. However in several variations of soil nailing works, the average difference of budget cost is 2,1% BOW method cheaper than SNI method. Thus the overall budget plan which calculated using BOW method have a 1,7% cheaper budget than using the SNI method. From this study it is known that BOW method still have the advantages of SNI method on budgeting costs.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Budget plan, SNI method, BOW methot, Soil Nailing
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) > TA190-194 Management of engineering works
Divisions: 03-Faculty of Engineering > 22201-Civil Engineering (S1)
Depositing User: Users 555 not found.
Date Deposited: 02 Aug 2019 06:17
Last Modified: 02 Aug 2019 06:17
URI: http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/1852

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item