PEMBUKTIAN PENGARUH JABATAN PENYELENGGARA NEGARA TERHADAP TERJADINYA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bengkulu Nomor : 45/Pid. Sus-TPK/2017/PN. Bgl.)

ARLIANSYAH, ARLIANSYAH and Febrian, Febrian and Achmad, Ruben (2019) PEMBUKTIAN PENGARUH JABATAN PENYELENGGARA NEGARA TERHADAP TERJADINYA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bengkulu Nomor : 45/Pid. Sus-TPK/2017/PN. Bgl.). Master thesis, Sriwijaya University.

[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_020126812043.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_020126812043.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_020126812043_TURNITIN.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_020126812043_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (31MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_01_front_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_01_front_ref.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_02.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_02.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (514kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_03.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_03.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_04.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_04.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (188kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_05_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_05_ref.pdf - Bibliography
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (392kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_06_lamp.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012681721043_003101603_0002095502_06_lamp.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (448kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This research is a normative legal research using the Law regulatory approach, and a case approach. This research uses primary legal and secondary legal materials and uses research steps that include determining legal issues, legal rules, analyze and interpret them for conclusions. This research aims to find out the category of action of State Official who use their influence in doing Corruption, Like How to Prove and about the construction of the law. In 2003 United Nations (UN) declared a United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). Trading in Influence was established as one of the acts of corruption. Indonesia has ratified the UNCAC, by publishing constitution of The Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2006 but the trading of influence has not been included. It is often debated even though there are no rules regarding the trading of influence, but a number of case are considered to be a form of trading in influence, the suspect has been convicted using bribery articles. The main difference between the act of trading in influence and bribery lies is in the subject , in which the trading in influence person involving the person that can be a influencer (not only the civil servant or state offifcial) while in the bribery lies must be part of the civil servant or state official. Secondly, the act of trading in influence has no direct contravention with his obligations but it make the use of his influence to get something, while bribery lies must be acceptance relating to his position and contrary to what should be. In terms of proof of corruption, in general, it’s based on criminal code procedures (KUHAP), there are two evidences and convictions of judges, in specific aspect is relating to materials that can be used by judges to find electronic documents such as pictures, audio and videos. Keywords : Proof, Trading in influence, authorities, state official, corruption

Item Type: Thesis (Master)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Proof, Trading in influence, authorities, state official, corruption
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General) > K3150 Public law
Divisions: 02-Faculty of Law > 74101-Law (S2)
Depositing User: Users 871 not found.
Date Deposited: 07 Aug 2019 06:13
Last Modified: 07 Aug 2019 06:13
URI: http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/2327

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item