PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK MELALUI PENERAPAN MODEL STUDENT TEAMS-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) DAN THINK, PAIR AND SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI JAMUR DI SMAN 3 TANJUNG RAJA

SIBARANI, PENI FALENTINA and Anwar, Yenny and Madang, Kodri (2019) PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK MELALUI PENERAPAN MODEL STUDENT TEAMS-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) DAN THINK, PAIR AND SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI JAMUR DI SMAN 3 TANJUNG RAJA. Undergraduate thesis, Sriwijaya University.

[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (3MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_01_FRONT_REF.pdf]
Preview
Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_01_FRONT_REF.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (830kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_02.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_02.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (567kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_03.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_03.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (287kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_04.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_04.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (413kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_05.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_05.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (88kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_ref.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (215kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_TURNITIN.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (15MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_06_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_84205_06091281520081_0014107901_0008016901_06_ref.pdf - Bibliography
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study aims to know about differences of achievement between students that using STAD and TPS model on mushroom material in SMAN 3 Tanjung Raja. The research method used was Quasi Experimental with Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Sampling using Saturated Sampling Techniques. The method of data collection is done by written tests for learning outcomes, observations for student activities, and questionnaires for students' responses to the application of learning models. Learning outcomes data were tested using t-test, while learning activities, responses, and implementation were analyzed descriptively. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, the sig value is 0.00 (sig <0.05), which is a significant difference in learning outcomes between STAD and TPS (Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected). The class with the STAD model had an average learning outcome of 70.15 with classical completeness of 59.37% while the class with the TPS Model had an average learning outcome of 84.25 with 100% classical completeness. The level of activity of the students with the TPS model was higher than the STAD with the TPS value of 89.57 (very active) while STAD 77.25 (active). The class gain with the STAD model has an average value of 37.65 while the class with the TPS model has a gain average value of 32.40. This means that the class with the STAD and TPS models are both good for improving student learning outcomes. Key Words: STAD, TPS, Learning Outcomes, Activities, Mushrooms

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Uncontrolled Keywords: STAD, TPS, Hasil Belajar, Aktivitas, Jamur
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
Divisions: 06-Faculty of Education and Educational Science > 84205-Biology Education (S1)
Depositing User: Users 2281 not found.
Date Deposited: 04 Oct 2019 05:05
Last Modified: 04 Oct 2019 05:05
URI: http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/10210

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item