PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM SEBAGAI ALASAN PENGHAPUS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI TERDAKWA PERKARA PENCURIAN DAN PENGANIAYAAN

FAWNIA, YURI ALPHA and Febrian, Febrian and Achmad, Ruben (2025) PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM SEBAGAI ALASAN PENGHAPUS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI TERDAKWA PERKARA PENCURIAN DAN PENGANIAYAAN. Masters thesis, Sriwijaya University.

[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050_COVER.jpg] Image
RAMA_74101_02012682125050_COVER.jpg - Cover Image
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (2MB)
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012682125050.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (3MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050_TURNITIN.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012682125050_TURNITIN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (18MB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_01_front_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_01_front_ref.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (3MB)
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_02.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_02.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (252kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_03.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_03.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (422kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_04.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_04.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (16kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_05_ref.pdf] Text
RAMA_74101_02012682125050_0031016203_0018096509_05_ref.pdf - Bibliography
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (146kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Restorative justice, as a means of reconciliation between the defendant and the victim in a criminal act, can produce different outcomes in judges' decisions. Generally, this reconciliation is used as a mitigating factor for the defendant. However, some decisions use restorative justice as a reason for acquitting the defendant, although normatively it is not considered a justification or a reason for forgiveness. Therefore, the issue discussed concerns the basis for determining restorative justice as a reason for eliminating criminal responsibility. for the defendant and its application in judges' decisions. This research used normative legal methods. From the results of the research findings reveal a shift in perspective on the realization of justice, from retaliation or suffering to restoration, prioritizing peace over criminal punishment and in perspective shifts the perpetrator's perspective of the crime which is not always being the object of punishment, to being given the opportunity to participate in the restoration of the situation, through apologies, compensation for losses arising from the crime, or fulfillment of other conditions agreed upon between the perpetrator and victim to achieve reconciliation. In its application, the Judge has progressively explored the law, considering that restorative justice serves as a reason to eliminate the unlawful nature of the crime and then acquit the Defendant of all legal charges. Although normatively, this type of decision should be rendered subject to justification and excusal, and the requirement that the defendant's actions are proven but fall within the scope of civil law. Whereas, Restorative justice is not a form of justification or excusal, but rather a new paradigm that eliminates the unlawful nature.

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Penerapan Restorative Justice, Putusan Hakim, Alasan Penghapus Pertanggungjawaban Pidana
Subjects: K Law > KL-KWX Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica > KNW1-4990 Indonesia
Divisions: 02-Faculty of Law > 74101-Law (S2)
Depositing User: Yuri Alpha Fawnia
Date Deposited: 23 Jul 2025 03:22
Last Modified: 23 Jul 2025 03:22
URI: http://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/179913

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item